The film settles in nicely about 20 minutes in as it takes nearly every correct turn on the path towards great storytelling. It's proof that crowd-pleasing, studio offerings (though it's a mini-major in Sony Pictures Classics) don't need to paint in broad, simple strokes to find success (this film played very well; the crowd clapped several times throughout). Which begs the question, why can't more films like this be this good?
The film wastes no time in setting up the conflict. The women employees of the Dagenham Ford plant (it pains me to specify that, especially after watching the film, but it is necessary) number less than 200 in 1968. Most of them work as sewing machinists. The loud buzzer goes off every morning — they're on the clock — and they begin to furiously stitch seat covers. It must have been grueling work. We see most of the women strip down to their underwear because it's so hot in the factory, and when it rains the roof leaks, but they push on, using strategically-placed umbrellas and buckets (the film is peppered with wonderful little details like this). They've just been down-graded to "unskilled" status in the latest pay round, something the women don't take kindly to.
Some of the men are for equality, some want things to stay the same; nearly all of the women want what is their right, but one character doesn't really care about the movement, saying "it's still a crappy factory job," and the film is richer for showing this perspective; Hawkins' husband (Daniel Mays,who appeared in this year's "Red Riding Trilogy") is supportive, but only to a degree. He comes to realize that being faithful and good to his wife is expected, not some rare gift, and he must learn to take her seriously; we even understand the corporate lackeys at Ford, and while they're no doubt in the wrong, this nuanced method keeps them from becoming villains in a film that doesn't need them. The stakes are high enough already.
"Made in Dagenham" comments on our time right now, but is also timeless in its themes. It echoes our current political climate and the push for change. It argues that change is good, but is also realistic about the push/pull dynamic and the efforts required by all to make progress happen. It never gives way to easy sentiment, instead opting for a more multifaceted, or intelligent, approach to crowd-pleasing. It's easy to look back and think we're so much more progressive now, but obviously, women today are still fighting for those same rights, so how far have we actually come? And in the future, how will we look back on this time with the benefit of hindsight? The film had us in its corner from the outset — in terms of its politics, that's a no-brainer. But the real accomplishment is how the filmmakers avoided the easy way out, and instead told the best story they could've from this material. [A-]
0 comments:
Post a Comment